Feed on
Posts
Comments

A great little tale to pass a slow golf week.

————————————-

Gathered on a ragged tee on the edge of an undisclosed location, the six of us squinted into the low morning sun for a snapshot to mark the occasion. Too early, my eyes said. Too sore, my body said.

Ready or not, this was to be the fulfillment of a much-anticipated round of golf. For several years, we had seen this links-like patch in the distance, private and out of reach. Now, as our host eased the black Suburban through the unmarked farm gate, swung round a small green hung on a cliff overlooking a broad, grey-sand beach, past an incongruous fire truck and on by another vast, rolling putting surface, the excitement rose to a shudder of anticipation.

Where the road ended and the course began – no pro shop, no logo golf balls, not even a sign to mark a point of departure – we were met by the course superintendent, a one-man crew of maintenance, security, starter and guide. He collected a small tribute for upkeep and handed out a rough map of the course that seemed to have little correspondence to the landscape that lay before us.

“It’s a little rougher in spots than you’re used to,” he said, in very evident understatement.

From our perspective on that first teeing ground, perhaps forty feet above the indistinct fairways spread out in front of us, it was an unremarkable view of former pasture land save for the broad vista of blue ocean anchoring a cloudless sky. The parched fescues, bright gold in the early morning light, were dotted with bright green gorse plants, not yet bushes, which lay in wait for the flagrant shot or the one that bounded through the generous fairways, too well struck or too unlucky. Undeterred, we hit away, stiffly in the cool morning, a little unsure of our destination. As we eased into the cadence of the round, walking, hitting, inventing, hoping, the only sounds were the rhythmic clack, clack of our clubs and the insistent pulse of the wind. Golf, like they say at Bandon Dunes, as it was meant to be.

The links at this Undisclosed Location are immensely playable for those with a sense of adventure and, well, play. True, there are some long carries that will challenge the high-handicapper, but nothing is stipulated here. If one doesn’t like the carry from the teeing ground – this is not some Victorian anachronism for a tee box, it is simply a flattish area for teeing up one’s ball – then another may be invented that suits the moment. Just as the course demands malleability from the golfer, so it is malleable in ways almost never found today. Playing from the gold tees on your regular Saturday round? Then go to the gold markers by rote, wherever the grounds crew has set them that day, often askew, no questions asked. Sadly, our sense of play in golf has been hemmed in by our own creations in the name of efficiency, or perhaps ego, and they give us less enjoyment than they might if we could just bring ourselves to loosen the constraints of self-perception that force us into our usual roles as golfers:  the capable from the tips, women and children up front and the great mass of us somewhere in-between.

There are well-made arguments for safety and pace of play. But the experience at the Undisclosed Location has given me renewed license for the playful anarchy I experienced as a teenager, when the evening light was filtering through the treetops and the marshals had long retired for the day. Golf, to be played well in a performance sense, can be a very demanding, precise and technical game. Unless the golfer aspires to a certain self-awareness and self-compassion, the play soon goes out of the game and along with it the real fun of the adventure. Real play in golf demands a spirit of spontaneous invention, tempered by a respect for others. We should make up the tee box from time to time, as we did that day, just to ensure that we can still perceive ourselves as capable of being creative and playful outside the box that the modern golf world insists we inhabit.

The biggest box of all, of course, is score. For the few hours of our trek across this windswept landscape, it felt like the usual markers of performance fell away. As we played from green H to green G, then to green F on the ocean’s edge and then to green K back inland, it was evident that for this round of golf, and for this group of golfers, score had little to do with the experience. If it was “about” anything at all, it was about play:  the challenge of perception, the creative insight of the moment, the club selection and shot shape. How many shots it took to put the ball in the hole wasn’t calculated, at least not publicly, nor was it even mentioned.

Being loosed from scoring that day brought with it a new-found freedom for us as players. Golf tethered too tightly to score can easily choke the play out of the game for any golfer. Who, with the possibility of a career round tantalizingly close, risks the low cut from under the trees or even thinks of attempting the high draw to a tight pin? Some, but perhaps only when the score for the day is beyond redemption or there’s no big prize on the line at the charity scramble. Disconnecting our perceptual apparatus from scoring, to really see the possibilities that might be had if the outcome wouldn’t show up on the card brings with it a wonderful freedom to invent the moment instead of reaching for the predictable. Why not try to join concept and execution in search of a memorable outcome? All you have to do is allow yourself to play. Skill and technique can be discovered, and sometimes taught, but no one can teach the willingness, vulnerability and confidence needed to be creative in the moment.

It takes a strong adult to behave like a natural child.

Depending on how we made up the course that day, we faced at least four blind shots to greens that were surprisingly accommodating to all but the worst shots. It’s always a surprise to listen to the antipathy of American golfers, and many golf course architects, to the blind shot. Why this should be so for amateur golfers, who are engaged in playing a game of little life-altering consequence, is puzzling on the face of it. To my sensibility, blind shots – the tee shot at the tenth at Royal County Down, the storied par three “Himalayas” at Prestwick, the approach to the second at Machrahanish come to mind – are among the most interesting in golf, a true test of judgment, execution and, above all, trust in both. We launch our ball into the unknown and hurry over the hill or around the dune to see the outcome, if it can be seen at all. That’s play! Those who insist on the perfectly framed view to the pin, or the bounce on manicured fairways that inevitably kicks forward to the target, miss an experience of one of golf’s great qualities:  the adventure of the unknown, of the egregious outcome beyond our control, for better or for worse.

At the Undisclosed Location, and so too in much of links golf, the known, or what is perceived from the tee or approach, is no less an adventure than the blind shot. The thirteen greens here are for the most part large, swooping affairs, saucer-shaped here, crowned there and, yes, hidden over there. Hidden too are false fronts, false sides and drop-offs from the backs of greens that are often disguised or simply not visible from the fairway. Flagsticks vary in height from four to seven feet, further confounding the eye and complicat­ing the club choice. I came to realize that tens of thousands of golf shots played to standard pins had hardwired my perceptual apparatus to an expectation of distance. I didn’t see what I was looking at. So a cross-country hole of our own invention that day, which looked for all the world to us to measure at least six hundred yards, turned out to be a downwind two-shotter largely because on arriving at the green the Lilliputian pin rose just four feet off the playing surface. Did it matter that our senses had been tricked by design? Not a bit. It was all part of the joy of play, the adventure of the game.

Can we play this game, the every day version of golf, with a spontaneous sense of adventure and imagination? We feel the excitement of the adventure to come as we pack the car, for instance, for a long road trip. There is no trepidation about whether we will drive the car well enough to stay between the lines at high speeds. We set off down the hiking trail full of expectation about the nature and views we will encounter along the way. There are no worries about our ability to swing our arms and move our feet in the proper sequence. But starting down the cart path that leads to the first tee seems to bring out all manner of concerns that need not be part of the game, but are so much part of being a player these days – the anxieties about performance, that ‘past is prologue’, that our equipment – physical or mental – is not up to the task. All this chips away at the often shoddy edifice of confidence in ourselves that would, were it something more authentic, allow us to simply play a game with whatever natural skills we possess, accepting whatever outcomes we create, or befall us.

We got a glimpse of the possibilities of play and adventure that day at the Undisclosed Location. I don’t recall how many holes we played in those four sublime hours. But by the end of the round we were in a state of exhilarated exhaustion brought on by the magic of the place:  the adventure, the invention and the constant buffeting of the wind. We had found, perhaps, an Undisclosed Location in the heart of compassion for ourselves, and for what, after all, is just a game wanting to be played.

————————————

Painting: Grant Bledsoe

About a month ago, I first heard about Aetna Springs Golf Course.  Some friends of mine were trying to get a group together to make the one hour drive to Pope Valley, near Napa in the Northern California wine country.  At first I didn’t pay the request much attention as my tastes in golf courses tend to differ from theirs but I figured it was worth a look.  Initial research revealed a course build in the 1880′s making it one of the oldest in the United States west of the Mississippi.  OK, now I’m listening.  A bit more research identified links between Tom Doak (minimalist designer of Pacific Dunes and Ballyneal, amongst others) and Aetna.  Apparently Doak was brought on for a full redesign in 2008.  Doak’s website describes the process of restoring many of the original hole routings while opting for smaller greens and narrower fairways given Aetna’s relatively short length (~6000 yards).

Now my interest is piqued.  Historic course, persimmon length, narrow fairways, small greens, Tom Doak redesign – I decide I want to play this course and sooner rather than later.  So I go to look for tee times and what do I find on the Aetna Springs website?  They are scheduled to play host to THE 2012 HICKORY OPEN in just four weeks!

The Hickory Open is held by the Shivas Irons Society, a California based group that takes motivation from the fictional golf pro of Michael Murphy’s Golf in the Kingdom.  Hickory clubs are being provided by Chris MacIntyre of Play Hickory Golf.  I’m really excited for this event as I’ve been eager to try my hand at hickory golf but always thought the events were more east-coast based.  In hindsight, this was because I was tracking the Society of Hickory Golfers events but wasn’t aware of the Shivas Irons Society events.   I think this will be the perfect opportunity to play my first hickory game at a great venue just an hour’s drive from my house.  I know now that the reasons I wasn’t aware of this course for so long were because A – it’s a nine hole track in the middle of nowhere and B – after the Doak redesign there were litigation problems (zoning disputes and whatnot) between Aetna Springs’ management and the local government.  Indeed, the course was on full stop for a couple years while the matters were settled.  In 2012 they re-opened but I think they are only open 3 or 4 days a week and they don’t actively promote through the usual advertising channels.

Since it is a 9-hole track so we’ll be going twice around.  The first time everybody will go hickory.  For the second nine we are free to play modern clubs or whatever we want.  I’ll be going with my standard steel shafted persimmon and forged blades.  It should provide a nice basis for comparison and an informed position from which to assess the quality of the course and my play.

If anybody has advice on how to practice for a hickory tournament without hickory clubs then please let me know.  I figure just slow things down and give the shaft time to work its magic.  Also, if any PGT or ABS members in California feel like meeting up for this event – the more the merrier!

Here are some old photos and new photos I found of the course and resort.

——————————–

——————————–

Old photos: Napa Valley Register

New photos: Terence Ford

 

One of the great writers of our time was inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame this week and I thought the occasion was worthy of a front page post.  The man and his body of work speak for themselves, and the acceptance speech doesn’t disappoint.  There are some great historical tidbits contained herein – just as you’d expect from somebody who’s been covering the tour for about 60 years.  Congratulations Dan.

——————————–

I’ve read they put me up here first because Tiger Woods and I have an early tee time tomorrow.

I really enjoyed that video. I thought it was great, and it was perfectly accurate. That vase, by the way, in another life, that would have been filled with Scotch, but at this stage of my development, it’s going to have to be iced tea. Of course I’m delighted and overwhelmed and pleased and all those things to be taken into this society. It’s a great club. And I’m particularly pleased to be taken in as a vertical human. I may be the first writer that ever did that.

I’m also happy about the rumor if I wear this blazer to my neighborhood drugstore I’ll get some discount on my medications.

The first person I want to thank, quite serious, everything I’ve had that’s been good in my life has come to me through the incomparable June Jenkins, who’s my bride of 52 years, my sweetheart, my secret weapon actually.

I need to thank an awful lot of people here and I’ll try to do it as quick as I can. But first I want to thank my kids for being here, my entrepreneurial sons Marty and Danny and my successful past winning sports columnist for the Washington Post, Sally Jenkins. She and I agree she’s been the best writer in the family for several years now.

I also want to thank all my friends who came here from Fort Worth and Colonial and Shady Oaks and New York and Boston and even some from Ponte Vedra, and probably a few strangers that I bought drinks for in New York who became their best friend.

I have to thank Deane Beman and Tim Finchem, two great commissioners who got this thing built, got this whole World Golf Village done. It was a marvelous idea and a tremendous undertaking, and they will be thanked several times tonight, but I want to be the first to do it. First of all, I don’t know how they did it, but they did, and it’s going to keep on growing.

I have to tell you if you’re a writer, a few years ago at the Atlanta airport this guy came up to me and said, “I know you.” I said, ‘I don’t think so.’ He said, “no, no, no, I’ve seen you. Why do I know you?” I said, ‘I’m just a guy catching an airplane.’ He said, “no, I know you. I’ve seen you somewhere. Who are you?” I said, well — I thought maybe he’d seen me on television — I said, ‘I’m a guy that writes for a national sports magazine and I’ve written four or five best sellers,’ and he goes, “well, you don’t have to be sarcastic.”

To justify my inclusion in this terrific society, I went back and looked at everybody who’s in it and did some statistics. It turns out that I have known 95 of these people when they were living. I’ve written stories about 73 of them. I’ve had cocktails and drinks with 47 of them, and I played golf with 24 of them. So I want somebody else to try and go up against that record.

Just to drop a few names, some of the people I’ve played golf with were Ben Hogan about 40 times, Sam Snead, Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer, Gary Player and even Babe Zaharias, and the ladies down here, these LPGA ladies will appreciate that. I played with Babe in 1951 at River Crest Country Club in Fort Worth in the old Texas Women’s Open. I was playing on the TCU golf team at the time but I was also working for the Fort Worth Press. I went over to Babe and saw her chipping and putting around the putting green and I said, ‘Are you going to play a practice round?’ And she just kind of looked at me. She knew me from a couple years earlier, and I said, ‘if you’re going to play a practice round, I want to play along with you,’ and she said, “how much you got in your pocket?” And I said, ‘well, I guess I could manage a $2 Nassau or something like that.’ So we played, jumped in the golf cart, played in about two and a half hours. I said, there’s no lady golfer going to out hit me. Well, she did, put that little low hook, went out there about 275, not only outhit me, she shot 71, beat me out of $8. But she wouldn’t take the money. She said, ‘I don’t mind robbing a college kid but I can’t rob a newspaper guy. We need you people.’

I know these other ladies have heard this story before, and she dropped one of her standard lines on me. We came around the golf cart, around the clubhouse to the putting green and we saw George, her husband, who was an ex-pro wrestler, and he was one of those guys who got wider the longer you looked at him, and she said, look at that, 12 years ago I married a Greek God. Now I’m just married to a damn Greek.

As for all those majors I’ve covered, it’s obviously a record that’ll never be broken because one day there’s not going to be any more magazines and newspapers in paper, and for that matter there’s not going to be any more people. There’s just going to be vampires and text messages and some voice saying, “turn left now.”

This was my 62nd Masters in a row, and that’s a lot of country ham and red eye gravy any way you look at it. I’ve enjoyed every minute of it, and I’ll be going to Olympic next month, where I’ve suffered several tragedies in the past as a sports writer. Every time I go there, Jack Fleck beats Ben Hogan, Billy Casper beats Arnold Palmer, Scott Simpson beats Tom Watson, Lee Janzen beats Payne Stewart, so I’m quite sure next month Phil Mickelson and Rory McIlroy and Bubba Watson are all going to lose in a playoff to Jack Fleck’s long lost nephew, and I’ll be there to cover it on deadline.

I have to cut to the chase here and get around to Ben Hogan because I knew him better than any other writer. I played golf with him over 40 times all through the 1950s when he was at his peak. He called me up one day, I used to watch him practice. He’d say, “let’s go play.” One day in 1956 he called me at the paper on the phone and said, “I’m going to play an exhibition for the U.S. Olympic fund, and I want you in the foursome.” And I said, ‘Ben, there’s got to be somebody better than me.’ He said, “no. You’re the one I want. We’ll have a lot of fun. My brother will play, there will be four of us.” ‘So I go out there, I work half a day. I expected maybe a couple hundred people. There are 3,000 people lining the first fairway. I somehow got off the tee okay down the fairway without injuring myself or anybody else, and then I topped a 3-wood, then I topped another 3-wood, then I top-scraped a 5-iron, and all I wanted to do was dig a hole and disappear. I could hear giggles in the gallery. Who is this idiot? How did this guy get here? Then I realized Ben was walking beside me as I dropped my ball and he gave me the greatest golf tip at the time under those conditions I’ve ever had. This proves he had a sense of humor. He said, “you can probably swing faster if you try hard enough.”

That’s a true story. I must have looked like I was swatting mosquitos or something. I slowed it down and got around in something under 80, I think. But it’s true that he offered to give me a lesson one day after we played a practice round at Colonial. We were sitting around having an iced tea or a drink or something, and he said, “you can keep the ball in the fairway off the tee and you’re a good putter. I wish I had your putting stroke,” which is true, but he said, “everything in between is a mystery,” and I said, ‘yeah.’ He said, “if you will work with me three days a week for the next four months, you might be good enough to play in the national amateur, qualify and play the national amateur.” And I said, Ben, ‘I’m flattered and I appreciate that, and I’m embarrassed to have to turn down an offer of free golf lessons from the greatest player in the world, but I just want to be a sports writer. That’s all I’ve ever wanted to be.’ He looked at me like I’ve seen him look at other people, with that cold stare, and you don’t know whether you’re going to get a bullet in the head or a dagger in the heart, and you wait and it seems like an eternity, and then he smiled and he said, “well, keep working at it. “

That’s what I’ve been doing for the last 60 years, and I guess I’ll keep doing it until I topple over and they start to work on my tombstone. I’ve already picked out two things. The first one is going to be, “I knew this would happen.” But I’ve got a better one. The better one is, “You guys hold it down here, I’m off to the next great adventure.”

Thank you all.

——————————–

 

In  golf, the phrase “rabbit” is used to describe a player who chases the tour seeking to Monday qualify.  The process can be grueling and the odds are always stacked against the aspiring qualifier.  Perhaps it’s the underdog, trial-by-fire nature of the occasion that makes the observer admire anyone who can advance.  Sean Martin recently documented the feel good story of Patrick Reed, the Augusta State product who found the backdoor into three consecutive PGA tour events.

———————————-

Reed was a first-team All-American last year at two-time national champion Augusta State but is without status on any major tour. After finishing 35th at the Texas Open, he made the nine-hour drive with his fiancee, Justine Karain, to New Orleans. They arrived at 2:45 a.m., sleeping four hours before the Zurich Classic’s Monday qualifier. An 8-iron to 2 feet on the second playoff hole earned him a second consecutive start. He birdied five of his final eight holes at TPC Louisiana to tie for 24th.

The pair took a circuitous route to this week’s Tour stop in Charlotte. Their first flight went from New Orleans to Chicago’s Midway International Airport. The next one landed in Greenville, S.C., some 90 minutes from Charlotte. They arrived at the hotel around 1:15 a.m. Monday, with another Monday qualifying round awaiting. He shot 65 to advance to the Wells Fargo Championship.

———————————-

I guess there’s something of a throwback feel that survives in Monday qualifiers.  It wasn’t that long ago that many touring pros were traveling by car, sharing hotel rooms, and accepting meals wherever they could.  For pros trying to Monday qualify, nothing is guaranteed and that very fact makes them more real and more personable.  I know I was rooting for Reed this week at Quail Hollow (he finished T32).

Aside from the traveling, there is something to be said for the hottest players getting the nod.  Golfers, as opposed to other athletes, come to be defined by their potential.  How low can you go?  Good weeks come in intervals, and the distance between the peaks and valleys can be vast.  No matter how long a golfer may have been “off”, the Monday qualifier let’s them get back to the highest level with one good week. This process ensures the hottest players get a shot, even today with the available spots down to only four.  If it was up to John Erickson, that number of spots would increase significantly.  From a recent thread discussing Q-School modifications and alternative tour formats:

———————————-

The other thing is that no matter how big it grows, it would always be set up for a healthy Monday culture so with 20 or 30 spots on Monday, you have the best players getting in every week. It really keeps the dream alive for people.. and if a player finds something in their swing or putting stroke, they can quickly go out and follow a few events around and play their way into the tour right away if they can shoot the scores. Golf should always be about who is playing good now.. not Mike Weir or Angel Cabrera.

———————————-

Fortunately, the loss of a traditional Q-school may have the unintended consequence of growing the Rabbit culture – on the Nationwide Tour.  While PGA Tour events generally have 4 MQ slots available, Nationwide events typically have 14.  Those spots should become more attractive to mini tour players who would normally maximize their time on, for example, the Hooters tour before taking a shot at the PGA Tour through Q-school.  Martin explains:

———————————-

Russel Knox started 2011 without Nationwide Tour status. He had earned more than $300,000 in the past three Hooters Tour seasons but was “100 percent willing to go broke,” he said, trying to Monday qualify for Nationwide Tour events. That statement is testament to the difficulty of the task.

He finished second in his first Nationwide Tour start to earn status. It’s not as easy as he made it look, though. Monday-qualifying events often have more than 200 players spread over two courses.

More players will enter Monday qualifying if the Nationwide Tour becomes the only route to the PGA Tour. The PGA Tour should respond by increasing the number of Monday-qualifying spots.

———————————-

Keep your eye out for Monday qualifiers as we proceed into the “Post Q-School” era.  We just might see a return of the rabbits.

Here we have the MacGregor Tourney PT1 irons from 1959.  These followed the colokroms of the same design which were the first to feature the new “recessed weight”.  This diamond shape muscle pad was blended into the rough forging to sit directly behind the sweet spot.  It also served to raise what they referred to as the “focal point” (Center of Mass) to produce a lower, boring trajectory which was perfect for the game at the time which was, in general, played neared to the ground.

These irons also incorporate the CF4000 ceramic face coatings.  CF4000 technology was developed by the aerospace industry but it was Toney Penna again who was the impetus behind applying it to golf clubs.   The black faces served to frame the ball nicely and were reported to protect the clubs from damage and corrosion.

As with most MacGregor clubs of the time the product code indicates both the shaft flex and grip type.  PT1 represents the Pro-Pel shaft in stiff flex along with the leather two tone grip.  Kaplan’s book describes MacGregor’s description of the Pro-Pel 1 as follows:

“Here’s the Pro-Pel Action shaft for the crisp, smashing play of fine golfers who have strong hand and forearm action.  The No. 1 shaft is light in weight but stiff in action.”

The PT1 is just a simple, straightforward blade that still retains popularity to this day.  Here’s some thoughts I have on the club:

  • Small head with minimal to no offset.
  • Squarish toe with a “raised toe” that was intended to make the clubface look larger than it actually is.
  • Moderately  heavy owing to the extra metal behind the face and the relatively long hosel.  You really can feel the clubhead well.
  • I would characterize the distance that I get from these clubs as slightly longer than average for a vintage iron, slightly shorter than modern
  • Very flat sole so these club dig deep if you attack from a steep angle.  Front edge is quite sharp so you need good control of your lowpoint.
  • The sweetspot is definately biased up and towards the hosel.  It’s a lovely crisp feel and low trajectory when you find it.
  • The topline has some thickness to it but it’s not excessive.  Middle of the road here in terms of classic irons.

I would characterize the PT1′s as being slightly less sought after than the earlier M85′s.  The colokrom version is probably more valuable than this CF4000 version.  A decent set with the original shafts would probably go for about $100 on ebay these days.  The diamond back shape is a MacGregor stalwart that they continued to produce with different variations into the 70′s or even 80′s.    I enjoy owning one of the earlier versions even though I don’t game them as much as the  M85′s.

—————————————-

Sources:

MacGregor Golf History – Catalogs by Jim Kaplan

Golf Club Identification and Price Guide IV by GolfWorks/Maltby

Here’s an old school move that you can pick up in a lot of really dynamic swings.  It basically consists of an “in” arm path on the way back and a left arm that goes more “out and over” after transition, making room for the right arm to work  perpendicular to the spine.  Credit to nutty Irishman “BOM” for first discussing this move with me and making better sense of it.  The trick is that the arm doesn’t have to take the shaft over the top with it – it can actually be used as a really good move for flatting the shaft and preparing it for a shallow entry.

John Erickson over at ABS has made the (I believe valid) point that “getting stuck” is a term born of more “modern” golf swings.  This club flattening, “out arm” move is an anti-stuck maneuver that  creates a lot of space to work with as you prepare to release the angles.   It’s a nice option for building a traditional golf swing as long as you have a pivot strong enough to get the club working left again after impact.

Now the term “plane” gets used in modern golf instruction a lot but I’ve come to accept that the idea of “staying on plane” can do a lot of damage for amateurs.  You can find a lot of modern golfers whose arms and club look almost exactly the same going up as coming down – no loop at all.  This is the type of move you would strive for if you were a strict TGM student working with laser pointers projected on the ground and is often the result of a lot of video work.  It takes talent to not get stuck from here and the entry is almost always steep.   Here are some examples of the “constant plane” model with left arm tracking back and then down through the same slot.

You can barely tell which is backswing and which is downswing in some of these.  I’m not saying this type of action can’t be functional – there are many ways to move a golf ball and these are all great players.  I’m also not saying that everyone in the old days had the “left arm out” move (they didn’t).  I’m simply saying that the idea of working the club up and down a constant plane for all of the club’s journey is unnecessary.

A loop of the hands and arms can be very beneficial to enhance feel and I prefer the homemade loopy swings that wouldn’t make the grade in a modern video analysis.   Don’t buy into the idea that the club (or arm) must remain  always on a constant plane.  There is too much history that proves otherwise.

 

Today I came home to one of the best sights of the unapologetic golfer – a rectangular shipping box!  Sorry for the crappy cell phone pic!

 

Assuming my wife hasn’t ordered some obscure vase or patterned umbrella it means a new golfing adventure for me.  In this case I knew what it was to be sure but there have been times when it could be any number of impulse-bought sticks, ready for their new lives of utility or a swift return to retirement.  Let’s see what’s inside!

Ok so it’s a triangle and not a rectangle.  You get the point.

Even when you know the make and model you can never quite be sure of the quality or condition of vintage gear bought on the secondary market.  It’s like a child at Christmas when you first rip in.  The sheen of the chrome is examined.  Scratches are inventoried and tallied.  A grip is found and tested for tact, moisture, durometer, thickness.  Slowly the feel and weight make themselves known.  Shape, offset, balance, and bounce are silently compared to the current set.  Will they jump in for immediate replacement?  Must they be given “the treatment” and brought into the same comfort zone we are used to or shall we instead adapt to them, hoping to steal a little magic from the previous owner?

You may be shocked to see that my most recent arrivals aren’t the most traditional.  I found some Mizuno ProII’s for super cheap with S400.  These are more of a muscleback than a blade as it were, circa 1996(?).  These puppies have a thin topline, squarish toe and transition from muscleback in the irons down to full blade in the wedge.  There appears to be a cavity but it’s barely functional as such and I don’t really plan to hit any that miss the muscle :) .

There is another reason that I pulled the trigger on these and it relates to nostalgia.  There is something powerful and lasting about seeing a good player (I mean really good) when you are young and new to golf. A good friend of mine (let’s call him P.D.) learned the game on the same executive 9-hole that I did but quickly moved up to cash games at the Country Club while I was still working on getting it airborn.  In high school he became the best player in our league and received all kinds of offers from big D1 colleges.  He ended up playing for a Junior College in Southern California but one summer he came back the City Championship.  For some reason I headed out to the course and met up with him to chat before the round.  Watching him hit balls in warmups was one of the most vivid golf memories of my youth.  This was the first time I had seen anyone take divot after divot, exactly the same shape and direction and always after the most pure strike your eyes and ears combined could show you.  One yard fade every time. It looked like he was finishing his swing before the ball took off – a very strange sight – I would often think he had mishit or even whiffed but the ball would take off low and rise up on a consistent trajectory each and every time.  Oh, and he was gaming Mizuno Pro II’s at the time.  He took the championship that year.

I’ve stayed in touch with P.D. over the years.  After finishing his Junior College golf he went for 1-year at Cal State Northridge before turning pro.  He got the sponsors, made a living on the mini-tours and Nationwide before hanging it up.   Midway through his pro career he had an accident (skateboarding or skiing or something) and it messed up his ankle.  After his accident the fade turned into a draw and he was still great but never again “Tour” great.

Anyways – I never forgot that day on the range watching him hit balls.  We now play about once a year and that is probably one of only a couple he plays every year.  The months spent grinding out a living took away his love of the game although he enjoys coming out with us (for the social aspect I presume).  It’s still a wonder to watch him compress it.  Maybe these are his old ProII’s and I’ll find a little big of that old magic left in them.

 

 

 

As promised, here’s Part 2 of Peter Thomson’ s Lesson.  I’ve also added great video compiled by Bradley Hughes.  I didn’t realize Thomson had so much success on the Champions Tour late in his playing days.  Let me repeat my warning that the presentation is quite slow and not well suited for the ADD internet generation.  Just be patient and Thomo will get there eventually.  I promise.

The Downswing

The Hit and Followthrough

Short Game

Putting

Conclusion

 

“Thomo” is one of the most underrated golfers of the persimmon age but has always been one of my favorites.  I love watching his tempo in the old footage.  He could just metronome you to death with a compact, repeatable swing.  Thomson, an intellectual by nature, identified the benefits of the “ground game” early on and refined a swing for maximum functionality on the links courses of Australia and Great Britain. The result was unmatched success in the British Open and perennial dominance on links layouts.   He was a relatively short hitter but earned a reputation as one of the finest strikers of the era.  One of the first to identify the budding, middle of the century trend towards forced carries and target golf on the US PGA Tour, Thomson eventually rejected these concepts in favor of designs that allowed runup and were conducive to low, controlled flights.    A while back I targeted Thomson as a good swing model for me and set out to learn what I could about the man and his approach to shotmaking and the game of golf.

I was disappointed to discover that Thomson never wrote any instructional books but did, in 1957, produce an instructional vinyl LP covering all the basics of good golf.  Through the miracles of E-commerce I was able to nab one for cheap and thought some of you might be interested to hear it too.

WARNING: The presentation is DRY.  Basic concepts of grip, stance, takeaway, top of the swing, downswing, hit and follow through, short game, and putting are covered in succession – sometimes exceptionally slowly.  Unfortunately, no advanced concepts are presented explicitly but the discerning golfer will be able to glean some of Thomson’s feelings and intentions from the material by “reading between the lines”.  There are a few fundamentals that are unique to Thomson’s approach and those few nuggets are pure gold and worth the price of admission.

For instance, I found particularly interesting (and somewhat unique)

  • Thoughts on ball position
  • How to change your grip pressure throughout the swing
  • The usefulness of “neck release” or turning the head through the shot
  • A unique and effective putting grip

You need some patience to distill the good stuff but if you have some time to kill, grab a glass of wine and head back to 1955 for a lesson from Peter Thomson.

Side Note: I apologize for the poor recording quality.  I had to record directly from a speaker, not digitally.  A sound engineer I am not.

I’m still working on recording the final sections so this first post covers  Side 1 of the LP and includes Grip, Stance, Takeaway, and Top of the Swing.  You should be able to play from this site or download the mp3′s.

Enjoy!

—————————————-

The Grip

The Stance

The Takeaway

The Top Of the Swing

—————————————-

 

 

 

When Justin Bieber is calling to offer Bubba congratulations, it’s clear to see his victory has transcended golf.  Why has everyone gotten so caught up in this victory?  It’s a combination of the venue, the person, and a refreshing look at a type of game which hasn’t been center stage is a while – artistic shotmaking.  John Huggan said it best in his recent Masters wrap:

——————————-

In the battle between art and science that rages within professional golf, the former has long been trapped on the ropes. True virtuosos such as Seve Ballesteros and Lee Trevino once roamed the links, but no more. Plodding is the way of things for the vast majority, the result of equipment that renders the shaping of shots all but obsolete. Where identifying a player after one swing was once the easiest of tasks from 400 yards away, that same feat today, with few exceptions, is all but impossible from a distance of 30 feet.

Thank goodness then, for the true eccentric, a goofy extrovert who cries at supermarket openings and plays exclusively through feel and imagination. Thank goodness for Bubba Watson, who reminds us with his every shot that golf in its purest sense is an art form to be savoured, not a lifeless organism to be studied in a test tube. Although, it must be said, the pink driver has to go.

——————————-

It’s simple.  People love seeing the ball curve through the air!  It is the ultimate act of imposing your will on the golf ball.  Vardon called it the “Masterstroke“.

Now I don’t think Bubba is perfect.  The press he generated on his recent trip to France was embarrassing.  He has acted classless towards veterans and I won’t even get into his $500,000 watch… but he is human, he is real, he is flawed, and he is FUN TO WATCH.  Why don’t other players play the way he does?  Well, part of it is the robotic nature of golf instruction the majority of the world subscribes to.  But part of it is for practical reasons – they don’t need to!  In today’s game you don’t need to work it significantly to score well.   In a recent conversation with Blade Junkie I mentioned a blog post that I read a long time ago, way before I had ever swung a persimmon club.  The post, excerpted below, is by Alex Noren, the Swedish professional golfer currently ranked 84 in the world.

——————————-

We were taught at an early age to master all ball flights. Fade, draw, straight, high and low. That is good, but to make it out on tour you have to be able to repeatedly hit the same shot over and over.  That could be a fade for someone, a straight or a draw for someone else. Just look at Tom Watson. He is a legend and he is 60 years old and can still compete with the world’s top players. He consistently hits the same shot, a little draw. We were always taught to hit a draw into a left flag, a fade into a right flag and so on. This made me very confused because I ended up being able to hit all shapes but I didn’t which shot came at which time. Watson hits the same shot to every flag. If he doesn’t want to go for a right pin he can just hit it to the middle of the green and have a go at a birdie. He will make a par at worst. If you hit the middle of each green, during a whole tournament I doubt you will finish outside the top-5. Make it easy for yourself. It has taken me these three years to really understand how to make it easy for myself out there. Now, I have to train my brain in action to think this way too. 

If I hit fourteen drives in one round, three years ago I would have tried to hit all different shapes with those drives to try to bend them in the way fairway bended or to prevent the wind to drift the ball too much. Now, I try to hit 14 equal shots. Straight…

——————————-

It’s a great case study here:  traditional instructors at the end of the persimmon age had been teaching Noren to work the ball.  But as he emerged into the professional ranks in the modern age, it simply wasn’t needed.   Part of that is the ball, to be sure, but Bubba has shown us that it can be done.  Let’s hope a new crop of young golfers see this and build their games more with art in mind,  not robotic science.  I can tell you that starting off with relatively heavy, traditional gear would give them a better chance than starting with lightweight, game improvement clubs.

Photo: Getty Images

Older Posts »